In our preceding discourse, we expounded upon the exigency for India to assume a leadership role, uniting the diverse nation-states of the Indian Subcontinent under the overarching concept of a Super Civilization State termed Hind, or simply, Akhand Bharata. This envisioned union encompasses all constituent nation-states within the historically revered region known as Hind which not only had been the envy of the rest of the world but the most admired and sought-after land on our planet. Building upon this premise, the present discourse endeavors to delve deeper into the challenges obstructing the realization of this union of all the sons of Bharta into a united entity, and to propose potential avenues for resolution
Akhand Bharata: Crafting the Path to ‘The Chakravarti’ for Collective Prosperity
To pave the path towards realizing a unified entity comprising the diverse nation-states of Hind, a strategic roadmap must be crafted. This journey necessitates a framework wherein each sovereign constituent state voluntarily cedes its authority to the central governing body of Akhand Bharata. In order to preserve cultural continuity, it is proposed that this central authority be referred to as “The Chakravarti”. A crucial aspect of this roadmap involves establishing a transparent and universally acceptable mechanism for appointing the Chakravarti, ensuring buy-in from all participating states.
Under this proposed union, constituent states would retain autonomy while delegating specific powers vital for fostering collective welfare, peace, and prosperity within Akhand Bharata. These delegated powers could be delimited to key domains such as defense, foreign relations, and economic coordination, thereby allowing individual states to retain full jurisdiction over internal affairs within their respective domains. This deliberative approach seeks to strike a delicate balance between centralized governance and decentralized autonomy, with the ultimate aim of fostering unity while respecting the diversity and unique identities of each constituent state within the broader framework of a unified Civilization State of Hind.
Obstacles in achieving Akhand Bharata
Religious Diversity Challenges: Navigating Hind’s Spiritual Tapestry
In contrast to ancient times when a unified religious doctrine prevailed across the Indian subcontinent, today’s landscape is characterized by a diverse religious fabric. Historically, the performance of grand rituals like the Ashwamedha Yagna by the most powerful king symbolized a shared cultural and religious ethos, where acceptance of suzerainty or confrontation was the prevailing norm. However, the modern subcontinent paints a different picture. The painful memory of a partition based on religious lines serves as a stark reminder of the challenges posed by divergent religious beliefs. This historical fracture underscores the arduous nature of uniting separated entities under a common banner, especially given the deep-rooted sentiments and identities tied to differing religious affiliations.
Ethnic Unity Amidst Diversity: Building Bridges Across Hind’s Cultural Mosaic
The intricate tapestry of Indian Subcontinent historical narrative has woven together a complex array of ethnic divisions and sectarian differences across its diverse regions. This rich tapestry, however, is not without its challenges, as deep-rooted rifts based on ethnicity and linguistic distinctions have emerged as significant obstacles in the path toward unifying the nation-states of India under a common banner.
One of the most profound challenges stemming from ethnic fragmentation is the presence of entrenched prejudices and historical grievances among different ethnic groups. These tensions often manifest in inter-community conflicts, political discord, and social disparities, impeding efforts toward fostering a sense of collective identity and shared purpose.
A poignant example of such discord is the longstanding animosity between communities such as the Afghan Pashtoons and Punjabi Pakistanis, which reflects broader ethnic fault lines within the subcontinent. These rifts, fueled by historical legacies, cultural differences, and competing narratives, underscore the complexity of achieving the conceived Civilization State of Akhand Bharata
Navigating Boundaries: Resolving Geopolitical Frictions in Hind
The specter of boundary disputes looms large over the landscape of the Indian subcontinent, presenting formidable obstacles to the vision of creating a unified Civilization State. These disputes, entrenched in historical legacies and contemporary geopolitical complexities, serve as primary catalysts for enmity and discord among the diverse constituents of the region.
One of the most enduring and contentious boundary disputes is exemplified by the Durand Line, delineating the border between Pakistan and Afghanistan. This colonial-era demarcation, imposed without regard to ethnic or tribal affiliations, continues to fuel tensions and animosities between the two nations, hindering efforts towards regional cooperation and cohesion.
Similarly, the Line of Control (LOC) between India and Pakistan stands as a stark reminder of unresolved territorial disputes that have fueled decades of conflict and strained bilateral relations between India and Pakistan. The contested nature of these boundaries not only exacerbates political tensions but also perpetuates cycles of mistrust and hostility, impeding progress toward broader regional integration and collaboration in proposed Civilization State of Akhand Bharata
Overcoming Myopic Vision: Embracing a Collective Future for Akhand Bharata
A significant challenge in uniting the various states of the Indian subcontinent lies in the myopic sight of its constituents. Instead of embracing the larger collective good, these entities are often consumed by deep-seated animosities towards each other, leading to a preference for seeking assistance from foreign powers rather than fostering cooperation with neighboring states.
A glaring example of this myopic outlook is evident in the case of Pakistan. Despite facing catastrophic floods of unprecedented magnitude, Pakistan refrained from seeking assistance from neighboring India. Conversely, India, fully capable of extending aid, adopted a cautious approach, waiting for Pakistan to initiate the request for help. This stands in stark contrast to India’s proactive engagement during crises such as the Doklam standoff in Bhutan or providing support to Nepal during the devastating earthquake.
This myopic sight not only hampers humanitarian efforts during times of crisis but also perpetuates a cycle of distrust and missed opportunities for regional cooperation and mutual assistance. It underscores the need for a paradigm shift towards a broader vision that prioritizes collaborative solutions and collective resilience in addressing shared challenges and crises.
Building Trust: Foundations for a Unified Civilization State of Hind
The perception of India’s vast size has contributed to a sense of apprehension and mistrust among the neighboring constituents of the envisioned Civilization State. There is a concern that India’s significant size and influence may lead to fears of gradual dominance or the relegation of other constituents to subordinate roles, diminishing their autonomy and influence on the global stage
Cultural Affinity as a Bridge: Reconnecting Akhand Bharata Historical Threads
The discord between India and Pakistan is exacerbated by a lack of cultural connection, particularly evident in Pakistan’s stance post-partition. Instead of embracing their shared historical and cultural roots with India, Pakistan has chosen to distance itself, preferring to identify more closely with Middle Eastern identities. This divergence has deepened a sense of alienation and disdain towards their own indigenous heritage among some factions in Pakistan.
The glorification of historical monsters like Bin Kasim, Ghazani, Gauri, and Abdali, who were associated with conquests marked by violence, loot, rape, and genocide of their own forefathers, reflects a troubling disconnect from their cultural roots. Rather than condemning these figures for their brutal actions, Pakistani’s in general idealize them, further widening the rift between historical narratives and fostering animosity rooted in divergent cultural perceptions.
Balancing Autonomy and Unity: Crafting a United Civilization State for Akhand Bharata
Given the aforementioned challenges, the formation of the Civilization State of HIND necessitates a nuanced approach that balances the imperative of granting individual constituents full autonomy over internal affairs with the collective pursuit of advancing the super-state’s interests on the global stage.
One potential framework to achieve this balance is akin to a United Kingdom-style Federation, wherein a common head of state presides over a union of fully autonomous nations, each with its unique governance structure. Under such a model, India could maintain its status as a secular democracy, while Afghanistan might adopt a theocratic Islamic system, for instance. Crucially, both nations must mutually acknowledge and respect each other’s sovereignty and refrain from interference in each other’s domestic politics, thus aligning their actions for the greater benefit of the Civilization State of Akhand Bharata
This approach advocates for clear delineation of boundaries, ensuring non-interference in internal affairs while fostering cooperation and mutual support on external matters. By upholding principles of mutual respect and non-intervention, this envisioned framework seeks to lay the foundation for a harmonious and effective Civilization State, capable of navigating complex global challenges while honoring the diverse identities and values of its constituent nations.
Solutions this Civilization State could offer to overcome the obstacles discussed above
Promoting Unity and Diversity: Prioritizing Religious Freedom in the Autonomous States of Akhand Bharata
To address religious obstacles in creating a union of Sovereign States of the Indian Subcontinent, one potential solution could be to prioritize religious freedom within the framework of the union. Each constituent state would have the autonomy to choose its own approach to religion, either by establishing a state religion or by remaining secular. This autonomy would be crucial in respecting the diverse religious and social fabric of the subcontinent. It would also be important to establish clear guidelines that prevent external interference from other nation-states regarding religious practices and social norms within each constituent state. This approach can help foster a sense of unity while also respecting the religious diversity that is inherent in the region.
Building Unity: Mitigating Ethnic Divisions Through a Unified Super-State of Akhand Bharata
Ethnic divisions, arising from historical animosities, can be effectively mitigated through the establishment of a unified super-state of Hind. As the populace from diverse ethnic backgrounds collectively experiences the advantages derived from collaborative efforts within this overarching entity, the entrenched ethnic divisions that have historically plagued the region will gradually diminish. This transformative process underscores the potential of inter-ethnic cooperation within a larger framework of shared governance, fostering a more cohesive and harmonious societal fabric across the subcontinent.
Resolving Boundary Disputes in Akhand Bharata: A Strategic Framework for Mutual Concessions and Future Resolution
In order to resolve boundary disputes within Hind, it is imperative for the constituent nations to demonstrate a willingness to make concessions for the collective benefit. However, achieving this mutual understanding and compromise may prove to be the most challenging aspect during the formation of the super-state. Therefore, it is crucial to establish a well-defined time frame within which the involved parties must work towards settling these disputes. In the event that an agreement cannot be reached within the specified time frame, the dispute should be automatically frozen in its current state for a predetermined period. This period should be sufficiently long to span across generations, allowing for a new cohort of leaders, who have been nurtured in a more conducive environment, to address and resolve the dispute effectively. This strategic approach ensures that boundary issues are not indefinitely prolonged and are instead tackled with a fresh perspective in the future.
Breaking Through Myopic Vision: Akhand Bharata for Mutual Prosperity and Stability
The myopic sight prevalent among various nation-states of the Indian subcontinent is a result of deep-seated animosities that have persisted for decades. Overcoming this shortsighted approach requires a shift in mindset towards a more inclusive and forward-thinking perspective. The establishment of a super-state presents a unique opportunity to transcend historical prejudices and foster a culture of cooperation and mutual benefit.
A key strategy to overcome this myopic sight is to emphasize the tangible advantages and long-term benefits that a united front can offer to all constituent nations. By highlighting the economic, social, and political gains that can be achieved through collaboration, leaders can encourage a shift from narrow-minded thinking to a broader vision that prioritizes regional prosperity and stability.
Building Trust for the Federation: Safeguarding Territorial Integrity in the Civilization State of Hind
This is going to be the most difficult thing to pass over, but the below steps, if followed in complete sincerity could help us wither it away.
To foster trust among the constituent nation-states regarding the proposed Federation of the Indian subcontinent, it is crucial to incorporate robust constitutional provisions that explicitly prohibit any alteration of borders for any constituent state by the central governing body, known as the Civilization State of Hind. These constitutional safeguards are essential to instill confidence among all constituent nations, assuring them that their territorial integrity will be safeguarded and not subject to diminishment under any circumstances. Such a clear and unequivocal commitment within the constitutional framework will serve as a cornerstone of trust and stability within the federation, providing a solid foundation for collaborative governance and harmonious relations among the diverse nations of the Indian subcontinent.
Building Confidence in Federation: Two-Tier Defense Structure for Collective Security of Akhand Bharata
To address defense-related mistrust within the proposed Federation of the Indian subcontinent, a two-tier defense institution can be established to ensure security and build confidence among constituent nations.
First Tier: A common percentage of GDP will be allocated by each constituent nation to support the central federal defense forces. These forces will be tasked with safeguarding the international borders of the Civilization State of Hind. Additionally, they will play a crucial role in preventing any constituent state from forcefully altering existing borders within the federation. This first tier provides a unified defense mechanism to protect the collective interests of all member nations and reinforces the principle of territorial integrity and stability.
Second Tier: In addition to the central federal defense forces, each constituent nation will retain the right to maintain its own defense forces independently. This dual-tier approach serves multiple purposes. Firstly, it allows constituent nations to have a sense of autonomy and control over their defense strategies. Secondly, the presence of decentralized defense forces acts as a mutual assurance mechanism, signaling to each nation that they have the means to protect their interests within the federation. This helps alleviate any mistrust that may arise during the formation of the super state, as each nation’s military presence acts as a guarantee against potential unfair treatment or deception.
By implementing this two-tier defense structure, the federation can strike a balance between collective security and individual sovereignty, fostering trust and cooperation among member nations while addressing concerns related to defense and national security.
No cross-national citizenship
Balancing Economic Integration and Demographic Integrity: Citizenship Policies in the Proposed Super-State
While promoting the free movement of labor and capital within the constituent nations of the proposed super-state, it is essential to implement restrictions on granting citizenship to individuals and their descendants who relocate within these nations. This policy mirrors the approach taken by the UAE, where immigrants and their offspring are not granted citizenship despite being born in the country. This measure aims to ensure that while people across the super-state can access and benefit from its economic opportunities, the demographic composition of constituent states and the rights of their native inhabitants remain safeguarded. By preserving the first right of natural inhabitants to their lands and resources, this approach mitigates concerns about demographic shifts and maintains the integrity of each region within the super-state.
Gold-Backed Super-State Currency: Balancing Fiscal Autonomy and Stability Across Constituent Nations
The proposed super-state should establish its currency tied to gold while allowing the currencies of constituent nations to have a free-floating exchange rate. This arrangement guarantees that no nation will be compelled to adhere to fiscal policies contrary to the desires of its populace. Moreover, it ensures that nations practicing sound fiscal planning are not deprived of the associated advantages.
Balancing Power in the Super-State: Strategic Governance Based on GDP Shares for Equitable Influence
The primary apprehension hindering the establishment of a super-state comprising smaller constituent nations revolves around the potential dominance of India due to its vast size and population. To allay these concerns, a strategic approach must be taken regarding power distribution in the decision-making process, aligning it with the respective GDP shares of each nation within the super-state. This framework fosters a competitive landscape among constituent states, incentivizing them to excel and adopt optimal strategies for economic and business development, thereby significantly benefiting their populations. Such an approach serves to mitigate India’s disproportionate influence stemming from its sheer scale, thereby alleviating the apprehensions regarding domination and promoting a more balanced and equitable environment within the super-state.
Lack of cultural connect
Embracing Heritage for National Unity: Pakistan’s Path to Overcoming Cultural Discord and Promoting Regional Harmony
Addressing the aforementioned obstacle requires concerted efforts from Pakistan, which stands as the sole nation in the subcontinent grappling with internal struggles regarding its historical roots, indigenous religion, and native language. This internal discord was starkly evident during the Bangladesh Liberation War when Bangladesh seceded from Pakistan due to the imposition of Urdu over Bangla, reflecting a deeper clash of cultural identities. Pakistan’s authorities perceived Bangla as the language of non-believers (Kafirs), leading to tensions and eventual separation.
To move past this historical burden, Pakistan must confront and dispel the delusions that estrange them from their own heritage and cling towards Middle East This involves a re-evaluation of cultural narratives and a reconnection with indigenous values, languages, and historical narratives that form the bedrock of Pakistan’s identity. Embracing this internal reconciliation can foster a stronger sense of unity and belonging within Pakistan and contribute positively to regional harmony within the larger Indian subcontinent.
Conclusion
Uniting the nations of the Indian Subcontinent as described above is no simple feat. Each nation holds a unique spectrum of feelings towards one another, ranging from warmth and friendship as seen in Bhutan and Bangladesh, to deep-seated animosity as seen in Pakistan. This endeavor is particularly daunting for Pakistan, as it necessitates a shift from venerating figures like Bin Kasim to embracing historical figures like Raja Dahir—a change deeply ingrained since the country’s inception.
Nevertheless, considering the broader welfare of the region, it is imperative to commence this endeavor, despite its inherent challenges. One cannot discount the possibility that, in light of the tumultuous history Pakistan has woven through its rejection of ancestral values, there may arise a readiness among its populace to embrace such a transformative initiative. Yet, even if Pakistan remains reluctant to participate, the endeavor itself carries intrinsic worth. It serves as a catalyst to unite the rest of the subcontinent into a more closely-knit and cohesive entity, one that can proudly unveil its historical grandeur and aspire to reclaim its rightful place on the global stage.
Pingback: Civilization State Hind - The Akhand Bharata